Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 04:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <8c8c0792-7ff7-4066-8262-3d17dd8743d4_at_n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 04:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <8c8c0792-7ff7-4066-8262-3d17dd8743d4_at_n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
[Snipped]
> Sorry. I should have been more explicit. I perfectly understand the
> relationship between assembler to machine language. I just do not see
> how one could use the term *cardinality* for that. I may seem picky
> on terminology but I do believe it is an apprpriate term to use.
Typo. Sorry. I meant
but I dot *not* believe it is an appropriate term to use. One word
can make an entire difference.
[Snipped]
Received on Sun Mar 09 2008 - 12:31:18 CET