Re: Object-relational impedence
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 04:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
> Sorry. I should have been more explicit. I perfectly understand the
> relationship between assembler to machine language. I just do not see
> how one could use the term *cardinality* for that. I may seem picky
> on terminology but I do believe it is an apprpriate term to use.
Typo. Sorry. I meant
but I dot *not* believe it is an appropriate term to use. One word
can make an entire difference.
[Snipped] Received on Sun Mar 09 2008 - 12:31:18 CET