Re: Object-relational impedence
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:39:47 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <ebeacc21-1c8c-4aa4-9591-4cde43ea84fb_at_n36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
On 8 mar, 23:11, Gene Wirchenko <ge..._at_ocis.net> wrote:
[Snipped]
> >Nothing but an simplyistic attempt to draw a vague abstract from a
> >physical behavior when using assembler.
>
> I can not parse the above.
Sorry. I should have been more explicit. I perfectly understand the
relationship between assembler to machine language. I just do not see
how one could use the term *cardinality* for that. I may seem picky
on terminology but I do believe it is an apprpriate term to use.
And even if was to admit that it would be a good term and one could see some form of cardinality between languages, quite frankly I don't see how one can jump from that to the previous conclusion.
That was my point.
> Sincerely,
>
> Gene Wirchenko
>
> Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
> I have preferences.
> You have biases.
> He/She has prejudices.
Received on Sun Mar 09 2008 - 00:39:47 CET