Re: Mixing OO and DB
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:30:28 -0800 (PST)
On Mar 6, 3:14 pm, Thomas Gagne <tga..._at_wide-open-west.com> wrote:
> Marshall wrote:
> > <snip>
> > A bunch of 3x5 cards in little drawers at the library is both a system
> > and a database.
> But they're stagnant and empty
BS. Define *stagnant* and *empty*
> until behavior decides what to write on
OK behavior *decides*... How can an OO *decide* stuff. Human decides not machines not anything..
> Without behavior they're useless.
No. Your line of thought is useless...
> interactive SQL is a behavior with the business rules originating with
> the author and meaning and value determined by the author (of the SQL).
Here we go. You are trying to create your own sloppy definition of how meaning and information should be established. What are you going to say next ? That RM is inherited from OO...What a bunch of crap...
You have written so much nonsense in this thread that my ear hurts...
> Visit <http://blogs.instreamco.com/anything.php> to read
> my rants on technology and the finance industry. Visit
> <http://tggagne.blogspot.com/> for politics, society and culture.
Received on Thu Mar 06 2008 - 20:30:28 CET