Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Robert Martin <unclebob_at_objectmentor.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 00:23:35 -0600
Message-ID: <2008030600233560903-unclebob_at_objectmentorcom>
>> On 2008-03-03 17:25:48 -0600, topmind <topm..._at_technologist.com> said:
>>
>>
>> C++ is a pretty wordy language. If I wrote it in Ruby I bet I'd beat
>> you by a wide margin.
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 00:23:35 -0600
Message-ID: <2008030600233560903-unclebob_at_objectmentorcom>
On 2008-03-05 10:16:30 -0600, topmind <topmind_at_technologist.com> said:
> On Mar 4, 10:52 pm, Robert Martin <uncle..._at_objectmentor.com> wrote:
>> On 2008-03-03 17:25:48 -0600, topmind <topm..._at_technologist.com> said:
>>
>>> But I think anybody inspecting both examples will clearly see that my >>> version is a lot less total code.
>>
>> C++ is a pretty wordy language. If I wrote it in Ruby I bet I'd beat
>> you by a wide margin.
> > I am a skeptical, but you are welcome to try. And, it would probably > be the meta features of Ruby that cut it down, not OOP.
The "meta" features of Ruby *are* OO.
-- Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob) | email: unclebob_at_objectmentor.com Object Mentor Inc. | blog: www.butunclebob.com The Agile Transition Experts | web: www.objectmentor.com 800-338-6716 |Received on Thu Mar 06 2008 - 07:23:35 CET