Re: Object-relational impedence

From: Robert Martin <unclebob_at_objectmentor.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 00:23:35 -0600
Message-ID: <2008030600233560903-unclebob_at_objectmentorcom>


On 2008-03-05 10:16:30 -0600, topmind <topmind_at_technologist.com> said:

> On Mar 4, 10:52 pm, Robert Martin <uncle..._at_objectmentor.com> wrote:

>> On 2008-03-03 17:25:48 -0600, topmind <topm..._at_technologist.com> said:
>>
>>> But I think anybody inspecting both examples will clearly see that my
>>> version is a lot less total code.

>>
>> C++ is a pretty wordy language. If I wrote it in Ruby I bet I'd beat
>> you by a wide margin.
> 
> I am a skeptical, but you are welcome to try. And, it would probably
> be the meta features of Ruby that cut it down, not OOP.

The "meta" features of Ruby *are* OO.

-- 
Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob)  | email: unclebob_at_objectmentor.com
Object Mentor Inc.            | blog:  www.butunclebob.com
The Agile Transition Experts  | web:   www.objectmentor.com
800-338-6716                  |
Received on Thu Mar 06 2008 - 07:23:35 CET

Original text of this message