Re: OO foundation
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:36:17 -0400
Message-ID: <47cf1256$0$4072$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>
> The foundation is much broader because of the need to provide dynamic
> elements (i.e., the relational model is a subset of the OO foundation).
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:36:17 -0400
Message-ID: <47cf1256$0$4072$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
H. S. Lahman wrote:
>>> First, I think it is important to clarify that the 'relational' in >>> the mismatch isn't referring to the fact that the OO paradigm uses >>> something other than set theory's relational model. The nature of >>> the impedance mismatch lies in the way the OO and RDB paradigms >>> implement the same relational model. >> >> Huh? I know of the lambda calculus as a foundation of functional >> languages and the relation model as foundation of RDBs. But I wonder >> what the formal foundations of the OO family of languages is >> (references, please).
>
> The foundation is much broader because of the need to provide dynamic
> elements (i.e., the relational model is a subset of the OO foundation).
You are so full of shit your eyes must be brown.
[nonsense snipped] Received on Wed Mar 05 2008 - 22:36:17 CET