Re: OO foundation

From: Bob Badour <>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:36:17 -0400
Message-ID: <47cf1256$0$4072$>

H. S. Lahman wrote:

> Responding to Nobis...

>>> First, I think it is important to clarify that the 'relational' in
>>> the mismatch isn't referring to the fact that the OO paradigm uses
>>> something other than set theory's relational model. The nature of
>>> the impedance mismatch lies in the way the OO and RDB paradigms
>>> implement the same relational model.
>> Huh? I know of the lambda calculus as a foundation of functional
>> languages and the relation model as foundation of RDBs. But I wonder
>> what the formal foundations of the OO family of languages is
>> (references, please).

> The foundation is much broader because of the need to provide dynamic
> elements (i.e., the relational model is a subset of the OO foundation).

You are so full of shit your eyes must be brown.

[nonsense snipped] Received on Wed Mar 05 2008 - 22:36:17 CET

Original text of this message