Re: Object-relational impedence
From: Robert Martin <unclebob_at_objectmentor.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 16:21:05 -0600
Message-ID: <2008030316210542612-unclebob_at_objectmentorcom>
>
> How can anybody discredit a data structure? Recently I was taught by our
> c.d.t. colleges that data are recorded facts. You didn't object them. So,
> may I humble ask you, who and how could discredit facts? (outside Usenet
> discussion forums, I mean... (:-))
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 16:21:05 -0600
Message-ID: <2008030316210542612-unclebob_at_objectmentorcom>
On 2008-03-03 15:11:19 -0600, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox_at_dmitry-kazakov.de> said:
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 11:44:07 -0800 (PST), topmind wrote:
>
>> OOP not only >> doesn't get one away from dealing with things as "structures", but >> uses structures that were discredited in late 60's.
>
> How can anybody discredit a data structure? Recently I was taught by our
> c.d.t. colleges that data are recorded facts. You didn't object them. So,
> may I humble ask you, who and how could discredit facts? (outside Usenet
> discussion forums, I mean... (:-))
Bryce is all hot and bothered about the vague similarity between network databases (which he asserts were discredited even though they remain the heart of nearly all directory systems and REST hierarchies) and object graphs.
-- Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob) | email: unclebob_at_objectmentor.com Object Mentor Inc. | blog: www.butunclebob.com The Agile Transition Experts | web: www.objectmentor.com 800-338-6716 |Received on Mon Mar 03 2008 - 23:21:05 CET