Re: Mixing OO and DB

Patrick May wrote:
> Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com> writes:
> > On Mar 1, 9:56 am, Patrick May <p..._at_spe.com> wrote:
> >> Marshall <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> writes:
> >> > Patrick May wrote:
> >> >> Marshall <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >> >> > Agreed. The general ledger schema and the general ledger
> >> >> > application cannot be decoupled.
> >>
> >> >> Now you're just being a twit.
> >>
> >> > You've had three or four opportunities to provide a substantive
> >> > refutation of the points I've been making, but apparently
> >> > assertions are all your capable of.
> >>
> >> If you provided substantive arguments instead of nonsensical
> >> strawmen, I'd be happy to respond in kind.
> >
> > If the teeth of a substantive argument clamped around
> > your ankle, you'd chew your leg off before you'd try
> > to pry it open.

>


>      I'll just leave the record to stand for itself.  I have the

Since I don't know how to work the Cool-O-Meter to measure such, I will say that RDBMS are in a good many critical and important systems. I've done projects for 2 large telecoms (your alleged forte), both house-hold names, and I can assure you they relied heavily on RDBMS.

(They'd be used even more if SQL had some strong relational language competition IMO.)

> as
> you keep the candles lit around your shrine to Chris Date, you need
> the comfort of your delusions of actually having made a valid point in
> an online discussion.

>


>      Here endith the lesson on how to flame on Usenet.


>

>

-T- Received on Sun Mar 02 2008 - 07:20:36 CET