Re: header part of the value?

From: Tegiri Nenashi <>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:24:12 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <>

On Feb 28, 1:02 pm, Jan Hidders <> wrote:
> Column names are just there to identify the role that the objects in
> the column play in the predicate, it is the name of the relation that
> should indicate the predicate. Why would we want to change that?

Well, it is debatable whether the chatty part of the relation

"The person name is ... and the person salary is greater than ..."

belongs to the relation name, or more naturally can be split into the attribute names. IMO the first alternative can't really exploit anything out of this additional information in the header. Received on Thu Feb 28 2008 - 22:24:12 CET

Original text of this message