Re: Mixing OO and DB

From: topmind <topmind_at_technologist.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:05:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <97bf58dc-f8fe-4f33-8284-6fdf11c2cf75_at_28g2000hsw.googlegroups.com>


Brian Selzer wrote:
> "topmind" <topmind_at_technologist.com> wrote in message
> news:3653ded5-6ad6-4555-8d1c-9cbd6954da07_at_n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> > On Feb 26, 3:16 pm, Tegiri Nenashi <TegiriNena..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 26, 3:09 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Feb 26, 1:28 pm, topmind <topm..._at_technologist.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > A "simple" API is going to replace a sophisticated and powerful
> > > > > query
> > > > > language? I don't think so.
> > >
> > > > I'm going to write a quick API (not too many classes with not too
> > > > many methods each) that will enable me to swap out C++ for LISP.
> > >
> > > Object independence is considered a good idea.
> >
> > Tushey! Paradigm Polymorphism
> >
>
> Tushey brings to mind a woman with a prominent derriere.

Is that a problem? :-) Actually, "Tushy" would be a better fit IMO.

> I guess being a
> topmind does not necessarily imply being a topspeller :-) Perhaps what you
> had in mind was "touch´┐Ż," yes?

Unicode goofs up some newsreaders and browsers. I'll stick with ASCII (ouch, that sounds painful).

-T- Received on Wed Feb 27 2008 - 17:05:14 CET

Original text of this message