Re: Mixing OO and DB

From: Brian Selzer <brian_at_selzer-software.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:51:59 -0500
Message-ID: <kf4xj.3044$pl4.677_at_newssvr22.news.prodigy.net>


"topmind" <topmind_at_technologist.com> wrote in message news:3653ded5-6ad6-4555-8d1c-9cbd6954da07_at_n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 26, 3:16 pm, Tegiri Nenashi <TegiriNena..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 26, 3:09 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Feb 26, 1:28 pm, topmind <topm..._at_technologist.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > A "simple" API is going to replace a sophisticated and powerful
> > > > query
> > > > language? I don't think so.
> >
> > > I'm going to write a quick API (not too many classes with not too
> > > many methods each) that will enable me to swap out C++ for LISP.
> >
> > Object independence is considered a good idea.
>
> Tushey! Paradigm Polymorphism
>

Tushey brings to mind a woman with a prominent derriere. I guess being a topmind does not necessarily imply being a topspeller :-) Perhaps what you had in mind was "touché," yes? Received on Wed Feb 27 2008 - 03:51:59 CET

Original text of this message