Re: cdt glossary [Data, Object]
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:40:13 +0100
Message-ID: <47b88d87$0$14347$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
>
> No.
> I'll think about it.
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:40:13 +0100
Message-ID: <47b88d87$0$14347$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
rpost wrote:
> mAsterdam wrote:
[snip address]
Thank you for contributing.
I snipped most text (agreement/taken for the glossary).
[Data]
>>>> "Known facts that can be recorded and have implicit meaning." >>>> -- Fundamentals of Database Systems, Elmasri & Navathe. >>> Not so good: the same data can have different interpretations. >> Only when you adhere to the idea that data may have no meaning.
>
> No.
Maybe you found a better definition or description. If you did, please share it.
[snip Information, Key, NULL]
> I'd never heard of fatic, but you explained it well (on Apr 7, 2006).
Thank you.
[Object]
>> Coming up with an agreeable definition of 'Object' in cdt >> will earn you real beer (in Amsterdam).
> I'll think about it.
I'll lower the bar. A visible, discussed attempt is good enough. The seriousness has no effect on the prize ;-)
[snip Primary key, Type, Class, Transaction] Received on Sun Feb 17 2008 - 20:40:13 CET