Re: Normalizing Tree Data
From: cr113 <cr113_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:15:38 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <dff1eec5-bbad-4a63-a82e-6fbdf5b50164_at_v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:15:38 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <dff1eec5-bbad-4a63-a82e-6fbdf5b50164_at_v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
On Feb 12, 8:22 am, "David Cressey" <cresse..._at_verizon.net> wrote:
> "cr113" <cr..._at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:a6634bec-eda0-477b-b93b-e2f6fe949e53_at_e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 11, 3:18 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> > Otherwise all those SQL joins would get ugly.
>
> What is ugly about SQL joins? Why are fnction calls not ugly?
OOPs. Wrong newsgroup. :) Received on Tue Feb 12 2008 - 23:15:38 CET