Re: Separate PK in Jxn Tbl?
From: Salad <oil_at_vinegar.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:58:14 -0800
Message-ID: <13q431li8ak5da6_at_corp.supernews.com>
>
>
> Well, the second S is right.
>
> So, adding a useless third column makes it simpler?!?
>
> That's a remarkable statement requiring extraordinary evidence. What
> evidence do you have to support such an assertion?
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:58:14 -0800
Message-ID: <13q431li8ak5da6_at_corp.supernews.com>
Bob Badour wrote:
> Salad wrote:
>
>> Sylvain Lafontaine wrote: >> >>>> I concede the point that for the two keys of the junction table, >>>> using an autonumber primary key is overkill except for special >>>> situations. >>> >>> >>> Shouldn't a database be designed right from the beginning? >>> >> I prefer KISS.
>
>
> Well, the second S is right.
Yes. That adequately describes you.
>> Thus I prefer an autonumber.
>
> So, adding a useless third column makes it simpler?!?
Yes.
>
>> Then again, junction tables are rarely needed.
>
> That's a remarkable statement requiring extraordinary evidence. What
> evidence do you have to support such an assertion?
I don't know if you develop database systems. From what I've read in your responses to others, you come off more as a blowhard than a developer creating a useful product. Received on Thu Jan 31 2008 - 18:58:14 CET