Re: Principle of Orthogonal Design
From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:35:45 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <8d33959b-cb40-44e8-b6f2-43978001c61c_at_n20g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:35:45 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <8d33959b-cb40-44e8-b6f2-43978001c61c_at_n20g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
On Jan 27, 4:49 am, "David Cressey" <cresse..._at_verizon.net> wrote:
> "Jan Hidders" <hidd..._at_gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> But I don't have a general understanding of what makes trivial dependencies
> trivial.
My understanding of "trivial" is that it has a very specific meaning in the context of FDs, namely that A -> B is trivial iff B is a subset of A.
Marshall Received on Sun Jan 27 2008 - 19:35:45 CET