# Re: Useful Unicode

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>

Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:22:05 -0400

Message-ID: <47989f10$0$4034$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>

>>>So impressed was I by mAsterdam's japanese 'reference' symbols, I

Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:22:05 -0400

Message-ID: <47989f10$0$4034$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>

> On Jan 24, 2:22 am, Tegiri Nenashi <TegiriNena..._at_gmail.com> wrote: >

*>>On Jan 22, 12:56 pm, JOG <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:**>>**>>**>>**>>*>>>So impressed was I by mAsterdam's japanese 'reference' symbols, I

*>>>decided to add them to my list of useful unicode. Yes, I am indeed,**>>>that cool, and hereby post said list partly as a google-group test,**>>>and partly (perhaps) to assist in the more mathematical cdt**>>>discussions:**>>**>>>inequality : ≠**>>>inference : →**>>>implication : ⇒**>>>not : ¬**>>>and : ∧**>>>or : ∨**>>>xor : ⊕**>>>xor : ⊻**>>>exists : ∃**>>>for all : ∀**>>>membership : ∈**>>>non-membership : ∉**>>>equivalence : ⇔**>>>empty set : ∅**>>>subset : ⊂**>>>proper subset : ⊆**>>>superset : ⊃**>>>proper superset : ⊇**>>>union : ∪**>>>intersection : ∩**>>>cartesian product : ∏**>>>division : ÷**>>>naturals : ℕ**>>>integers : ℤ**>>>rationals : ℚ**>>>reals : ℝ**>>>complex: ℂ**>>>infinity : ∞**>>>references: レ**>>>references unique: ル**>>>masterdam smiley : ☺**>>**>>I believe I saw this rendered correctly, but now that I'm trying to**>>post something on sci.math most of the symbols do not render properly**>>in GG IE!*> > > yeah, checking in IE , the second xor, non-membership, the empty set, > and the naturals, integers, etc, don't render. Hooray for microsoft > and their continued support of standards. Market Failure 101 anyone....

What makes you think there is a market for standardization? Received on Thu Jan 24 2008 - 15:22:05 CET