Re: cdt glossary [Graph] (was: what are keys and surrogates?)
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:14:47 -0800 (PST)
> > Really! I have seen a (mathematical) relation formally defined as a
> > subset of a cartesian product (and not an ordered tuple) on many
> > occasions.
> Bit confused by this - a cartesian product generates a set of ordered
> tuples (over which a function is a subset), and all the hyperlinks you
> listed seemed to follow that description.
Do you agree that most authors define a binary relation as a set of ordered pairs? In an earlier post you said a function is the ordered triple (D,C,G). How do you reconcile saying that a function is a (binary) relation? Received on Sat Jan 12 2008 - 09:14:47 CET