Re: what are keys and surrogates?
From: David BL <davidbl_at_iinet.net.au>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:28:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <e9852f89-bf95-4d59-a230-60fa5f3134be_at_h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:28:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <e9852f89-bf95-4d59-a230-60fa5f3134be_at_h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
On Jan 11, 1:11 pm, Keith H Duggar <dug..._at_alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> David BL wrote:
> > Marshall wrote:
> > > An interesting note, by the way: functions are relations...
>
> > Isn't it more precise to say that the graph of a function is a
> > relation?
>
> No, it isn't.
>
> http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Function.html
From mathworld a relation
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Relation.html
is defined as a subset of a cartesian product. If a function is a
relation why do they define a graph of a function f as
{ (x,f(x)) | x in domain of f },
as described in