Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?

From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 01:57:39 +0100
Message-ID: <477ae0c8$0$85779$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>

raylopez99 wrote:

> ... Actually you should call Go "chess".
> Then say: I'm going to go chess playing!

No. You are confused enough as it is. Received on Wed Jan 02 2008 - 01:57:39 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: JOG: "Re: Something new for the New Year (2008)."
Previous message: Bob Badour: "Re: Something new for the New Year (2008)."
In reply to: raylopez99: "Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?"
In reply to raylopez99: "Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?"
Next in thread: JOG: "Re: Something new for the New Year (2008)."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message