Home
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by date
comp.databases.theory: by date
45 messages
:
Starting
Sat Dec 15 2007 - 00:51:39 CET,
Ending
Sat Dec 15 2007 - 23:56:54 CET
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [
thread
] [
author
] [ date ] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Date view
] [
Next, Date view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Saturday, 15 December 2007
Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...)
-CELKO-
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
-CELKO-
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
-CELKO-
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
-CELKO-
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form.
Kira Yamato
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form.
Kira Yamato
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?
Evan Keel
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form.
Jan Hidders
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
Brian Selzer
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
David Portas
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?
mAsterdam
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form.
Kira Yamato
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
Roy Hann
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
Jan Hidders
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form.
Jan Hidders
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
David Cressey
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?
David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
David Portas
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?
David Cressey
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
JOG
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
Bob Badour
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
David Cressey
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
Bob Badour
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
Bob Badour
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?
Bob Badour
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?
raylopez99
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
raylopez99
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
raylopez99
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships?
raylopez99
Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
raylopez99
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
Jerry Gitomer
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
Bob Badour
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
Roy Hann
Re: Another view on analysis and ER
JOG
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
Brian Selzer
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
Brian Selzer
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next?
Hugo Kornelis
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
Hugo Kornelis
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK?
Tony Rogerson
Last message date
:
Sat Dec 15 2007 - 23:56:54 CET
Archived on
: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 22:50:24 CEST
45 messages
sort by
: [
thread
] [
author
] [ date ] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Date view
] [
Next, Date view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
.::
Blogger Home
::
Wiki Home
::
Forum Home
::
Privacy
::
Contact
::.