Re: One-To-One Relationships

From: Bob Badour <>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:50:07 -0400
Message-ID: <47503131$0$5257$>

rpost wrote:

> Bob Badour wrote:
> [...]

>>He didn't like the figment argument? I thought it was careful and quite 
>>clear. Perhaps, I should elaborate:
>>Entities are subjective and products more of applied psychology than 
>>applied mathematics.

> I'm sorry, but that is only because you choose to be stuck with a particular
> brand of applied mathematics that happen to not include them, and you throw
> a tantrum when it is argued that it would make perfect sense to do so.

Tantrum? You are an idiot.

> No doubt you have actual, mathematically formalizable arguments as to
> why entities don't fit in with this particular brand of applied mathematics,
> and how it offers one or more superior alternatives to dealing with the
> issue Chen pointed out. I'm eager to learn what they are.

Figments of your imagination are neither formal nor mathematics.

> (Tonight I want to post a detailed reply to your earlier posting
> to explain why it didn't actually address Chen's issue, so let's go
> from there.)

Sure. Maybe someone else will read it. Plonk. Received on Fri Nov 30 2007 - 16:50:07 CET

Original text of this message