Re: One-To-One Relationships
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 03:33:00 GMT
Message-ID: <MvL3j.74483$cD.23540_at_pd7urf2no>
JOG wrote:
...
>
> Yup.
Okay, I think that makes you a natural-born implementor even though I
have no idea what you spend your other time at (besides enjoying
somebody else's company of course). I don't mean "implementor" as in
"don't tell me the problem as that will only slow me down solving it".
Just what is it that qualifies them to be entities? Free will? (I'd be
okay with that.) Or do they not need to qualify? I'd be okay with that
as well. Personally, I think a system needs no qualification is needed
but some way is needed to distinguish between them and it shouldn't be
hidden from the programmer nor a user. If it's hidden from one but not
the other, they might not be talking about the same entity and for me
that's not a system.
This might sound mystical, but after all, Herman Melville has been called a mystic, so I'm not bothered about it as I've never seen him post here. Received on Fri Nov 30 2007 - 04:33:00 CET