# Re: RM formalism supporting partial information

From: Jan Hidders <hidders_at_gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 05:57:06 -0800 (PST)

Message-ID: <3cfff050-fcd9-4547-b0b3-a15e14f4e701_at_i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>

Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 05:57:06 -0800 (PST)

Message-ID: <3cfff050-fcd9-4547-b0b3-a15e14f4e701_at_i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>

On 26 nov, 11:47, Jan Hidders <hidd..._at_gmail.com> wrote:

*>
**>
*

> Really? That case looks rather simple to me. If we consider the usual

*> 6 algebra operators from the named perspective then, under the
**> assumption that the operations contain the set of certain answers then
*

The above should have said "assumption that the *operands* contain the set of certain answers then".

> all except the difference also return the certain answers, and the

*> difference returns something that is neither the certain nor the
**> possible answers.
*

- Jan Hidders