Re: RM formalism supporting partial information

On 26 nov, 11:47, Jan Hidders <hidd..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Really? That case looks rather simple to me. If we consider the usual
> 6 algebra operators from the named perspective then, under the
> assumption that the operations contain the set of certain answers then

The above should have said "assumption that the *operands* contain the set of certain answers then".

> all except the difference also return the certain answers, and the
> difference returns something that is neither the certain nor the
> possible answers.

• Jan Hidders