Re: RM formalism supporting partial information

From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:35:38 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4ba1840c-00ca-4917-b49a-b93db7223c82@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com>

On Nov 16, 9:20 am, Alfredo Novoa <alfred..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16 nov, 18:06, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> > > I agree. I propose to ditch the term "attribute" and to use "heading
> > > element".
>
> > I wouldn't even bother with that. In a predicate or proposition, the
> > name is a variable name--either free or bound. In a tuple, the name is
> > also a variable name or the name of a dimension or um a domain name.
>
> In a tuple I would call "tuple elements" to the pairs formed by name
> and value.
>
> Regards

Wow, in the span of two days we get Jan and Alfredo both back. Hi guys!

Marshall Received on Fri Nov 16 2007 - 11:35:38 CST