Re: RM formalism supporting partial information
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:46:04 -0400
Message-ID: <473ba482$0$5273$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>>On Nov 15, 1:20 am, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>paul c wrote:
>>>
>>>>David BL wrote:
>>>>...
>>
>>>>>http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~davidbl/MVattributes.doc
>>
>>>>>This is still a work in progress.
>>
>>>>>I welcome any comments.
>>
>>>By the second paragraph, the document entered into the realm of
>>>nonsense, and I stopped reading.
>>
>>An attribute has a name and a domain. How is that nonsense?
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:46:04 -0400
Message-ID: <473ba482$0$5273$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
Marshall wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2:21 pm, David BL <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote: >
>>On Nov 15, 1:20 am, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>paul c wrote:
>>>
>>>>David BL wrote:
>>>>...
>>
>>>>>http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~davidbl/MVattributes.doc
>>
>>>>>This is still a work in progress.
>>
>>>>>I welcome any comments.
>>
>>>By the second paragraph, the document entered into the realm of
>>>nonsense, and I stopped reading.
>>
>>An attribute has a name and a domain. How is that nonsense?
> > You didn't say an attribute *has* a name and a domain. You said > an attribute *is* a name and a domain. So you can have two > different attributes with the same name.
He also said an attribute is a set of values. Received on Thu Nov 15 2007 - 02:46:04 CET