Re: RM formalism supporting partial information

From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:01:47 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <92ecb0fc-eb59-417c-9327-a8a0a80a47c5@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>

On Nov 14, 2:21 pm, David BL <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
> On Nov 15, 1:20 am, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> > paul c wrote:
> > > David BL wrote:
> > > ...
>
> > >>http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~davidbl/MVattributes.doc
>
> > >> This is still a work in progress.
>
> > >> I welcome any comments.
>
> > By the second paragraph, the document entered into the realm of
> > nonsense, and I stopped reading.
>
> An attribute has a name and a domain. How is that nonsense?

You didn't say an attribute *has* a name and a domain. You said an attribute *is* a name and a domain. So you can have two different attributes with the same name.

Marshall Received on Wed Nov 14 2007 - 19:01:47 CST