Re: atomic

From: paul c <>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:48:16 GMT
Message-ID: <QF2Yi.183966$1y4.113908_at_pd7urf2no>

paul c wrote:

> along with a constraint such as B REFERENCES R.

In conventional RM talk, I don't think I've ever seen anybody write "B REFERENCES R" even though it makes some sense to me, ie., I don't see a logical reason to disallow it in theory even though it might not be of a reasonable practical use. Maybe some people would read it as meaning B REFERENCES all attributes of R. Received on Tue Nov 06 2007 - 19:48:16 CET

Original text of this message