Re: atomic
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_ooyah.ac>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:26:56 GMT
Message-ID: <Ql2Yi.182024$Da.73598_at_pd7urf1no>
... For a given value of R, there couldn't be any tuple of B
> that isn't a tuple of R!
...
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:26:56 GMT
Message-ID: <Ql2Yi.182024$Da.73598_at_pd7urf1no>
paul c wrote:
> Bob Badour wrote:
> ...
>> ... You seem to keep thinking >> recursive type declarations have the same problems as recursive value >> declarations. They don't.
... For a given value of R, there couldn't be any tuple of B
> that isn't a tuple of R!
...
Maybe I should have said that R defines a relation the possible values of which include tuples that are in the domain of B. So maybe I was mixing up values with types and instead of talking about R{A int, B typeof R}, I was confusing it with something like R{A int, B typeof R} along with a constraint such as B REFERENCES R. Received on Tue Nov 06 2007 - 19:26:56 CET