Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_ooyah.ac>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:20:33 GMT
Message-ID: <RBKVi.159684$Da.1387_at_pd7urf1no>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:20:33 GMT
Message-ID: <RBKVi.159684$Da.1387_at_pd7urf1no>
Bob Badour wrote:
...
> It seems he considered them unecessary in the sense one can always
> normalize the data to obviate the need for them.