Re: normalization review

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:47:29 -0300
Message-ID: <46d25718$0$4064$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net>

landonkelsey wrote:

> 2 is violated ...why?

Because you have made up a set of FD's whereby it violates 2nf.

> Evan Keel wrote:
> 

>>>What normal form is violated here?
>>>What could fix the problem?
>>
>>[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>
>>>telephone number | time of call | telephone location(precise)
>>
>>No form is violated.
Received on Sun Aug 26 2007 - 23:47:29 CDT