Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?

From: V.J. Kumar <vjkmail_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 02:13:49 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <Xns9996CDCC3B45vdghher@194.177.96.26>

Jan Hidders <hidders_at_gmail.com> wrote in news:1187998409.227306.271460_at_e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

> On 24 aug, 16:35, "V.J. Kumar" <vjkm..._at_gmail.com> wrote:

>> You may be right,  but then why the formula was not written with an
>> explicit 'and' ?

>
> Because it does not satisify all the logical laws of an AND, so to
> avoid confusion another notation is used.

What logical laws of AND are violated when we interpret

'def(x):f(x)' as 'def(x) and f(x)' ? Received on Fri Aug 24 2007 - 19:13:49 CDT