Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:42:39 -0300
Message-ID: <46cf5087$0$4041$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
>>Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>>>David Portas wrote:
>>
>>[snip]
>>
>>
>>>>4) Have the right schema to start with so that no problem arises.
>>
>>>But that would dampen the straw!
>>
>> Break eggs for an omelet; dampen straw for bricks.
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>
>>Gene Wirchenko
>>
>>Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
>> I have preferences.
>> You have biases.
>> He/She has prejudices.
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:42:39 -0300
Message-ID: <46cf5087$0$4041$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
Ed Prochak wrote:
> On Aug 20, 8:18 pm, Gene Wirchenko <ge..._at_ocis.net> wrote: >
>>Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>>>David Portas wrote:
>>
>>[snip]
>>
>>
>>>>4) Have the right schema to start with so that no problem arises.
>>
>>>But that would dampen the straw!
>>
>> Break eggs for an omelet; dampen straw for bricks.
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>
>>Gene Wirchenko
>>
>>Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
>> I have preferences.
>> You have biases.
>> He/She has prejudices.
> > > > I wonder how much of these discussions on NULL are echoes of > discussions about numbers when ZERO was first introduced? Both are a > practical solution to realworld business problems. 8^)
Uh... no. Received on Fri Aug 24 2007 - 23:42:39 CEST