# Re: NULLs: theoretical problems?

Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:34:05 -0000

Message-ID: <1187699645.789970.23980_at_57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>

On 21 aug, 01:13, "V.J. Kumar" <vjkm..._at_gmail.com> wrote:

*> Jan Hidders <hidd..._at_gmail.com> wrote innews:1187645998.798282.58960_at_g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:
**>
**>
**>
*

> > On 20 aug, 17:14, "V.J. Kumar" <vjkm..._at_gmail.com> wrote:

*> >> Jan Hidders <hidd..._at_gmail.com> wrote in
**> >> news:1187599195.269472.153110 _at_a39g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
**>
**> >> > On 20 aug, 01:48, "V.J. Kumar" <vjkm..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
**> >> >> I wonder what the truth tables for 'AND' and 'OR' would look like
**> >> >> with the DEF operator. Could you show those tables ?
**>
**> >> > They would be the usual table you already gave:
**>
**> >> >> x y AND
**> >> >> -------
**> >> >> defined
**> >> >> 0 0 0
**> >> >> 1 0 0
**> >> >> 0 1 0
**> >> >> 1 1 1
**>
**> >> What is 'x AND y' equal to if x is '1' and y is not defined ?
**>
**> > The database would not allow you to write that. If y is nullable then
**> > it forces you to write "DEF y : x AND y".
**>
**> What is DEF y : x AND y equal to if x is '1' and y is not defined ?
*

False. Because DEF y : f(y) means that (1) y is defined and (2) f(y) holds.

- Jan Hidders