comp.databases.theory: by thread

Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 02:41:50 CDT)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 03:20:07 CDT)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 05:57:07 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 09:57:13 CDT)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 12:18:42 CDT)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 02:27:28 CDT)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 04:27:39 CDT)
      - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 07:47:37 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 07:51:34 CDT)
      - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 16:32:19 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 05:14:32 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 05:23:35 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 07:47:56 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 10:06:29 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 11:16:28 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 11:28:16 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Sun Jul 29 2007 - 23:48:00 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:18:46 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 06:15:28 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 06:38:07 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 12:34:29 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 07:46:24 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 08:33:16 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 18:06:37 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 22:10:54 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Bob Badour (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 23:13:56 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Sun Jul 29 2007 - 10:51:32 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Sun Jul 29 2007 - 23:44:07 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 00:43:49 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 01:25:50 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:22:35 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Bob Badour (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:39:37 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 07:18:23 CDT)
        Identifying by location -- Was: A pk is *both*... David Cressey (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:13:35 CDT)
        
        Re: Identifying by location -- Was: A pk is *both*... paul c (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 19:57:45 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Gene Wirchenko (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 12:07:13 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 06:58:30 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Sat Jul 28 2007 - 05:35:36 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Sun Jul 29 2007 - 01:22:27 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 18:36:03 CDT)
Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 10:28:32 CDT)
- Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 11:03:09 CDT)
  - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 11:15:44 CDT)
  - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 12:00:19 CDT)
    - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 12:39:09 CDT)
      - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 15:24:28 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 15:46:00 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 20:37:25 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 12:48:42 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 14:32:10 CDT)
Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 17:23:20 CDT)
Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Bob Badour (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 09:31:15 CDT)
- Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Nis Jørgensen (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 09:43:16 CDT)
  - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Marshall (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 13:34:06 CDT)
    - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements paul c (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 14:45:37 CDT)
      - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements JOG (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 14:59:25 CDT)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 11:33:14 CDT)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements JOG (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 04:59:16 CDT)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 11:15:23 CDT)
      - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Cimode (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 08:44:26 CDT)
      - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 11:30:17 CDT)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Cimode (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 14:37:05 CDT)
    - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 11:23:59 CDT)
      - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Cimode (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 14:38:43 CDT)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 18:22:46 CDT)
Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Neo (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 16:22:14 CDT)
Bachman diagrams and E-R model beginner16 (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 20:01:52 CDT)
What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? beginner16 (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 20:08:30 CDT)
- Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? Bob Badour (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 21:22:14 CDT)
- Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? Alfredo Novoa (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 05:52:32 CDT)
  - Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? beginner16 (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 10:24:20 CDT)
    - Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? mAsterdam (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 11:17:20 CDT)
- Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? David Cressey (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 06:22:22 CDT)
  - Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? Jon Heggland (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 07:54:49 CDT)
  - Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? beginner16 (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 10:44:34 CDT)
    - Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? David Cressey (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 11:42:09 CDT)
      - Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? beginner16 (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 13:22:56 CDT)
      - Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? paul c (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 11:43:13 CDT)
        
        Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? David Cressey (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 12:43:44 CDT)
        
        Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? paul c (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 13:02:11 CDT)