- Friday, 20 July 2007
- Re: A simple notation, again paul c
- Re: A simple notation, again paul c
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? paul c
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer
- Re: A simple notation, again David Cressey
- Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Cimode
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour
- Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? TroyK
- Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker
- Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour
- Re: A simple notation, again paul c
- Re: I still don't understand whether the term data model... kaja_love160_at_yahoo.com
- Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost kaja_love160_at_yahoo.com
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour
- Re: A simple notation, again David Cressey
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? David Cressey
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? DBMS_Plumber
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer
- Last message date: Fri Jul 20 2007 - 22:29:35 CEST
- Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 22:16:34 CEST
|