Oracle FAQ
Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" SRC="http://www.orafaq.com/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?jscript"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <A HREF="http://www.orafaq.com/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?banner=NonSSI;page=01" TARGET="_blank" onMouseOver="window.status='Click here! Support the Oracle FAQ by supporting our sponsors.';return true" onMouseOut="window.status='';return true"> <IMG SRC="http://www.orafaq.com/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?page=01" HEIGHT=60 WIDTH=468 ALT="Support the Oracle FAQ by supporting our sponsors. Click here!" BORDER=0> </A> </NOSCRIPT>
Home
->
Community
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
24 messages
:
Starting
Tue Jul 17 2007 - 00:36:27 CDT,
Ending
Tue Jul 17 2007 - 23:51:31 CDT
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Thread view
] [
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Roy Hann
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 03:14:27 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 16:15:38 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Roy Hann
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 17:47:59 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 22:28:58 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Roy Hann
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 03:41:40 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Bob Badour
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 07:25:04 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
David Cressey
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 09:59:14 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Roy Hann
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 10:12:54 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 05:56:15 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
David Cressey
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 06:28:07 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 08:39:02 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Nis Jørgensen
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 08:26:55 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 21:42:42 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
David Cressey
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 18:22:53 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 20:22:28 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
David Cressey
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 00:16:18 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 10:18:27 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
paul c
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 10:38:15 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
paul c
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 10:54:37 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
David Cressey
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 12:56:35 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 22:07:49 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
David Cressey
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 06:23:51 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 12:23:26 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Roy Hann
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 03:03:48 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Bob Badour
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 07:26:01 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Roy Hann
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 09:43:15 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Bob Badour
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 11:03:24 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 10:08:15 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
joelle.alcock_at_gmail.com
(Sun Jul 22 2007 - 19:13:45 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
JOG
(Sun Jul 22 2007 - 19:16:34 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
David Cressey
(Mon Jul 23 2007 - 02:41:50 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
JOG
(Mon Jul 23 2007 - 03:20:07 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
David Cressey
(Mon Jul 23 2007 - 05:57:07 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Mon Jul 23 2007 - 09:57:13 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
JOG
(Mon Jul 23 2007 - 12:18:42 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Tue Jul 24 2007 - 02:27:28 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
JOG
(Wed Jul 25 2007 - 04:27:39 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
David Cressey
(Wed Jul 25 2007 - 07:47:37 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
JOG
(Wed Jul 25 2007 - 07:51:34 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Wed Jul 25 2007 - 16:32:19 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
JOG
(Thu Jul 26 2007 - 05:14:32 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
JOG
(Thu Jul 26 2007 - 05:23:35 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
David Cressey
(Thu Jul 26 2007 - 07:47:56 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
JOG
(Thu Jul 26 2007 - 10:06:29 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
paul c
(Thu Jul 26 2007 - 11:16:28 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
JOG
(Thu Jul 26 2007 - 11:28:16 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Sun Jul 29 2007 - 23:48:00 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
David Cressey
(Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:18:46 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Tue Jul 31 2007 - 06:15:28 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
David Cressey
(Tue Jul 31 2007 - 06:38:07 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Tue Jul 31 2007 - 12:34:29 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
David Cressey
(Thu Jul 26 2007 - 07:46:24 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
paul c
(Thu Jul 26 2007 - 08:33:16 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Fri Jul 27 2007 - 18:06:37 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
paul c
(Fri Jul 27 2007 - 22:10:54 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Bob Badour
(Fri Jul 27 2007 - 23:13:56 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Sun Jul 29 2007 - 10:51:32 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
paul c
(Sun Jul 29 2007 - 23:44:07 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Mon Jul 30 2007 - 00:43:49 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
paul c
(Mon Jul 30 2007 - 01:25:50 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
David Cressey
(Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:22:35 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Bob Badour
(Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:39:37 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Tue Jul 31 2007 - 07:18:23 CDT)
Identifying by location -- Was: A pk is *both*...
David Cressey
(Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:13:35 CDT)
Re: Identifying by location -- Was: A pk is *both*...
paul c
(Mon Jul 30 2007 - 19:57:45 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Gene Wirchenko
(Mon Jul 30 2007 - 12:07:13 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Tue Jul 31 2007 - 06:58:30 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
David Cressey
(Sat Jul 28 2007 - 05:35:36 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Sun Jul 29 2007 - 01:22:27 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
paul c
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 18:36:03 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
Brian Selzer
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 23:51:31 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
paul c
(Thu Jul 12 2007 - 09:20:29 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
Brian Selzer
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 00:36:27 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
paul c
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 08:51:49 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
Bob Badour
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 12:12:05 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
paul c
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 18:44:47 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
paul c
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 08:52:42 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
Brian Selzer
(Mon Jul 16 2007 - 13:05:34 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
David Cressey
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 02:16:12 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
mAsterdam
(Sun Jul 22 2007 - 15:27:53 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
Cimode
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 03:10:59 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
paul c
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 08:57:52 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
Cimode
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 13:59:05 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
paul c
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 20:48:47 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
David Cressey
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 06:39:06 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
paul c
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 17:53:21 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
David Cressey
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 23:47:01 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
paul c
(Fri Jul 20 2007 - 11:38:17 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
David Cressey
(Fri Jul 20 2007 - 13:39:39 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
Bob Badour
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 07:45:43 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
Cimode
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 14:53:54 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
paul c
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 16:20:54 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
paul c
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 17:39:49 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
Cimode
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 02:48:31 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
David Cressey
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 06:41:54 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
mAsterdam
(Sun Jul 22 2007 - 15:39:25 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
Cimode
(Tue Jul 24 2007 - 08:52:38 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
Brian Selzer
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 16:19:13 CDT)
Re: A simple notation, again
Lennart
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 14:52:32 CDT)
question using aggregate function
Mia
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 15:29:35 CDT)
Re: question using aggregate function
David Portas
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 15:56:02 CDT)
Re: question using aggregate function
paul c
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 19:14:06 CDT)
Re: question using aggregate function
Bob Badour
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 20:09:42 CDT)
Re: question using aggregate function
paul c
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 22:28:27 CDT)
Re: question using aggregate function
paul c
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 22:31:41 CDT)
Re: question using aggregate function
Bob Badour
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 07:17:04 CDT)
Re: question using aggregate function
David Cressey
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 10:01:00 CDT)
Re: question using aggregate function
Bob Badour
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 11:04:58 CDT)
Re: question using aggregate function
TroyK
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 09:38:21 CDT)
Re: question using aggregate function
TroyK
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 11:43:12 CDT)
Re: question using aggregate function
Jonathan Leffler
(Tue Jul 17 2007 - 22:57:04 CDT)
Re: question using aggregate function
David Portas
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 01:18:06 CDT)
Re: question using aggregate function
David Cressey
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 00:03:21 CDT)
Re: question using aggregate function
David Cressey
(Wed Jul 18 2007 - 00:18:33 CDT)
Re: question using aggregate function
Cimode
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 03:23:17 CDT)
Re: question using aggregate function
Cimode
(Thu Jul 19 2007 - 03:24:56 CDT)
Last message date
:
Tue Jul 17 2007 - 23:51:31 CDT
Archived on
: Sat Aug 25 2007 - 16:26:45 CDT
24 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Thread view
] [
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
