Re: TRUE and FALSE values in the relational lattice
From: Vadim Tropashko <vadimtro_invalid_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:46:34 -0700
Message-ID: <1182447994.451601.103370_at_m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:46:34 -0700
Message-ID: <1182447994.451601.103370_at_m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
On Jun 21, 2:25 am, Jon Heggland <jon.heggl..._at_idi.ntnu.no> wrote:
> Heh. If you ask me, it would be nice if R /\ TRUE = R, R /\ FALSE =
> FALSE, R \/ TRUE = TRUE and R \/ FALSE = R. That requires 01 for TRUE
> and 10 for FALSE, right?
This shows once again how evasive the concepts of truth and falseness are:-)
Thanks for supporting my notation, BTW;-) Received on Thu Jun 21 2007 - 19:46:34 CEST