Re: TRUE and FALSE values in the relational lattice

From: Jon Heggland <>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:40:52 +0200
Message-ID: <f5ai5j$ngs$>

Vadim Tropashko wrote:
> As expected this expression is valued to 00 or 01, so Marshall was
> eventually right when interpreting those relations as TRUE and FALSE.

Not to disparage your contributions or anything, but hasn't the association between TABLE_DUM / 00 and FALSE, and TABLE_DEE / 01 and TRUE been known for many, many years?

Received on Wed Jun 20 2007 - 08:40:52 CEST

Original text of this message