Re: TRUE and FALSE values in the relational lattice
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:40:52 +0200
Vadim Tropashko wrote:
> As expected this expression is valued to 00 or 01, so Marshall was
> eventually right when interpreting those relations as TRUE and FALSE.
Not to disparage your contributions or anything, but hasn't the association between TABLE_DUM / 00 and FALSE, and TABLE_DEE / 01 and TRUE been known for many, many years?
-- JonReceived on Wed Jun 20 2007 - 08:40:52 CEST