Re: How would a relational operating system look like?

From: DBMS_Plumber <paul_geoffrey_brown_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:22:42 -0700
Message-ID: <1181330562.209696.115310_at_x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com>


On Jun 4, 10:58 am, "Brian Selzer" <b..._at_selzer-software.com> wrote:
> "DBMS_Plumber" <paul_geoffrey_br..._at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1180976599.740262.134510_at_k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...> On Jun 3, 7:57 pm, "Brian Selzer" <b...@selzer-software.com> wrote:
> >> Are domains variable in a relational operating system?
>
> > Brian! Think bigger, man!
>
> > Not only are domains extensible, but even the set of operators in the
> > algebra!
>
> I'm just wondering how each and every atomic value (file) in a relational
> operating system can be located in one and only one place so that it can be
> shared by multiple users at the same time.

  This is gonna sound strange.

  There are no 'files'. A 'file' is an application level construct.

   If you wanted to create a 'domain' with the same properties as a 'file', then you'd need to also create a set of domain operators that did similar things to posix. But I would encourage people to avoid that notion. Received on Fri Jun 08 2007 - 21:22:42 CEST

Original text of this message