Oracle FAQ
Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" SRC="http://www.orafaq.com/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?jscript"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <A HREF="http://www.orafaq.com/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?banner=NonSSI;page=01" TARGET="_blank" onMouseOver="window.status='Click here! Support the Oracle FAQ by supporting our sponsors.';return true" onMouseOut="window.status='';return true"> <IMG SRC="http://www.orafaq.com/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?page=01" HEIGHT=60 WIDTH=468 ALT="Support the Oracle FAQ by supporting our sponsors. Click here!" BORDER=0> </A> </NOSCRIPT>
Home
->
Community
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
10 messages
:
Starting
Fri Jun 01 2007 - 01:08:12 CDT,
Ending
Fri Jun 01 2007 - 13:27:13 CDT
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
"No one does ER Modelling any more" <-- Is this claim true?
nupul
(Fri Jun 01 2007 - 01:08:12 CDT)
Re: "No one does ER Modelling any more" <-- Is this claim true?
Bob Badour
(Fri Jun 01 2007 - 08:44:19 CDT)
Re: "No one does ER Modelling any more" <-- Is this claim true?
Marshall
(Fri Jun 01 2007 - 09:33:10 CDT)
Re: "No one does ER Modelling any more" <-- Is this claim true?
Alfredo Novoa
(Fri Jun 01 2007 - 13:27:13 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Eric
(Fri Jun 01 2007 - 02:20:01 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
V.J. Kumar
(Fri Jun 01 2007 - 05:58:11 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Marshall
(Fri Jun 01 2007 - 09:23:59 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Jan Hidders
(Fri Jun 15 2007 - 07:21:01 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
V.J. Kumar
(Fri Jun 15 2007 - 09:00:30 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Jan Hidders
(Fri Jun 15 2007 - 09:57:44 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
V.J. Kumar
(Fri Jun 15 2007 - 16:17:20 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Jan Hidders
(Fri Jun 15 2007 - 17:59:57 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
V.J. Kumar
(Sat Jun 16 2007 - 08:13:19 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Jan Hidders
(Sun Jun 17 2007 - 17:32:26 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
V.J. Kumar
(Sun Jun 17 2007 - 20:11:14 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Jan Hidders
(Mon Jun 18 2007 - 04:39:02 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
V.J. Kumar
(Tue Jun 19 2007 - 08:28:56 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Jan Hidders
(Tue Jun 19 2007 - 09:07:58 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
V.J. Kumar
(Tue Jun 19 2007 - 09:30:25 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Jan Hidders
(Tue Jun 19 2007 - 09:50:46 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Vadim Tropashko
(Tue Jun 19 2007 - 11:58:33 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
V.J. Kumar
(Tue Jun 19 2007 - 15:39:27 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Vadim Tropashko
(Tue Jun 19 2007 - 16:08:13 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
V.J. Kumar
(Tue Jun 19 2007 - 15:37:42 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Vadim Tropashko
(Tue Jun 19 2007 - 16:14:20 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
V.J. Kumar
(Tue Jun 19 2007 - 16:58:18 CDT)
Domain dependence
Vadim Tropashko
(Tue Jun 19 2007 - 17:19:50 CDT)
Re: Domain dependence
V.J. Kumar
(Tue Jun 19 2007 - 17:40:54 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Jan Hidders
(Tue Jun 19 2007 - 18:09:00 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
V.J. Kumar
(Tue Jun 19 2007 - 19:09:54 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Jan Hidders
(Wed Jun 20 2007 - 06:21:00 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
V.J. Kumar
(Wed Jun 20 2007 - 06:57:41 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Jan Hidders
(Wed Jun 20 2007 - 07:26:44 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri Jun 15 2007 - 16:53:16 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
V.J. Kumar
(Fri Jun 15 2007 - 18:21:25 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri Jun 15 2007 - 18:45:19 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
V.J. Kumar
(Sat Jun 16 2007 - 09:16:46 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Vadim Tropashko
(Mon Jun 18 2007 - 13:14:51 CDT)
Re: From class diagram to physical data model : conceptual data model or not ?
ssingh
(Fri Jun 01 2007 - 09:06:57 CDT)
Re: From class diagram to physical data model : conceptual data model or not ?
Alfredo Novoa
(Fri Jun 01 2007 - 13:14:36 CDT)
Re: Complement in Relational Lattice
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri Jun 01 2007 - 11:30:43 CDT)
Last message date
:
Fri Jun 01 2007 - 13:27:13 CDT
Archived on
: Sat Aug 25 2007 - 16:23:05 CDT
10 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
