Re: choice of character for relational division

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 23:02:07 GMT
Message-ID: <PRWPh.18232$PV3.188947@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>

Marshall wrote:

> On Apr 1, 3:00 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>

>>David Cressey wrote:
>>
>>>>... all the good operators have been taken!
>>
>>>I'm just picking up on this now.  Did the author mean "all the good symbols
>>>have been taken" instead of "all the good operators have been taken"?
>>
>>Operators are symbols by definition. He didn't say that all the good
>>operations have been taken.

>
> All the good nonalphabetic symbols used to represent functions
> typically via infix notation but sometimes for prefix or suffix
> have been previously owned?
>
>
> Marshall
>
> PS. But are protected by our extended warranty?

Don't forget the "fully reconditioned" part! Received on Sun Apr 01 2007 - 18:02:07 CDT