Re: choice of character for relational division

From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: 1 Apr 2007 16:00:45 -0700
Message-ID: <1175468445.659304.173050@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>

On Apr 1, 3:00 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> David Cressey wrote:
>
> > > ... all the good operators have been taken!
>
> > I'm just picking up on this now. Did the author mean "all the good symbols
> > have been taken" instead of "all the good operators have been taken"?
>
> Operators are symbols by definition. He didn't say that all the good
> operations have been taken.

All the good nonalphabetic symbols used to represent functions typically via infix notation but sometimes for prefix or suffix have been previously owned?

Marshall

PS. But are protected by our extended warranty? Received on Sun Apr 01 2007 - 18:00:45 CDT