Re: choice of character for relational division

From: David Cressey <cressey73_at_verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 21:35:34 GMT
Message-ID: <GAVPh.879$gb6.69@trndny07>

"Marshall" <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com> wrote in message news:1175445445.567586.212190_at_n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 1, 8:02 am, "Bruce C. Baker" <bcbake..._at_cox.net> wrote:
> > "Marshall" <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote in message
> >
> > news:1175417520.382456.123840_at_p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > > On Mar 31, 11:01 pm, "Bruce C. Baker" <bcbake..._at_cox.net> wrote:
> >
> > <snip Marshall's excellent responses to my posts>
> >
> > >> > I'll pick one of those. Okay, it's $.
> >
> > >> Your choice, of course,and FW( little )IW I'm cool with that.
> >
> > >> (I'm not trying to rain on your parade, Marshall; just pointing out
that
> > >> all the good operators have been taken! :-) )
> >

I'm just picking up on this now. Did the author mean "all the good symbols have been taken" instead of "all the good operators have been taken"? Received on Sun Apr 01 2007 - 16:35:34 CDT