Daniel wrote:
> On Mar 19, 4:38 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>>Daniel wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Even so, it might be helpful to enumerate the properties that a thing
>>>must have to be regarded as value, immutability, etc. Then we can ask
>>>whether an instance of an ADT satisfies those properties.
>>
>>An ADT is not a value.
>
> Non sequitur? Has anyone suggested that it is?
I notice you have conveniently ignored everything else I wrote to pick a
nit. Plonk.
Received on Mon Mar 19 2007 - 16:45:51 CDT
