Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view
From: Daniel <danielaparker_at_gmail.com>
Date: 19 Mar 2007 13:59:50 -0700
Message-ID: <1174337990.185713.68790_at_n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
Date: 19 Mar 2007 13:59:50 -0700
Message-ID: <1174337990.185713.68790_at_n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 19, 4:38 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Daniel wrote:
>
> > Even so, it might be helpful to enumerate the properties that a thing
> > must have to be regarded as value, immutability, etc. Then we can ask
> > whether an instance of an ADT satisfies those properties.
>
> An ADT is not a value.
Non sequitur? Has anyone suggested that it is?
Regards,
Daniel Parker
Received on Mon Mar 19 2007 - 21:59:50 CET