Re: Table/Attribute Modeling
Date: 14 Mar 2007 08:58:19 -0700
On Mar 14, 3:14 pm, "Tony D" <tonyisyour..._at_netscape.net> wrote:
> On Mar 14, 1:07 pm, "Cimode" <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 14, 1:03 pm, "Walt" <wami..._at_verizon.net> wrote:
> > > "mAsterdam" <mAster..._at_vrijdag.org> wrote in message
> > >news:45f71197$0$325$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl...
> > > > Walt wrote:
> > > > > -CELKO- wrote:
> > > > >> LOL! Larry Constantine used beat up on Software Engineers for saying
> > > > >> "methodology" instead of "method" because methodology is the study of
> > > > >> methods and not one in particular. He also had a great definition: "A
> > > > >> method is what you do next when you don't known what to do next." --
> > > > >> very practical!
> > > > > The same "word inflation" was used when "technology" began to be used
> > > where
> > > > > "technique" would have been more apropos.
> > > > So it is T/A P then? P for Paradigm, of course.
> > > Of course, the greatest methodology of them all is "Structured Hierarchical
> > > Information Technology". The acronym is left as an exercise for the reader.
> > I disagree....;)
> > You are not making this sexy enough...Something like
> > Structural Hierarchical-XML Information Technology would be more
> > fitting...Check out my description for guidelines into creating buzz
> > words
> OK, I've been reading some OO stuff so feel up for the challenge !
> How's about :
> Fully Updateable XML Object Relational Enterprise Data
Perfect! the anagram for that is
FUXORED....(it has all the subconsciously induced messages that would make the buzz word a success..If you see what I mean)....
> Or you would be, if you tried it ;)
> - Tony
Received on Wed Mar 14 2007 - 16:58:19 CET