Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view
Date: 12 Mar 2007 11:34:50 -0700
Message-ID: <1173724490.757769.205370_at_8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com>
On 12 mar, 19:08, "Dmitry Shuklin" <shuk..._at_bk.ru> wrote:
> On 10 อมา, 18:32, "JOG" <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > - Row A says Aristotle is a Row Z
> > - Row Z says a Human is a mortal.
>
> No,
> Row A has attribute Name = "Aristotle" and attribute Type = RowZ
> Row Z has attribute Lifetime = "mortal"
You are stating the same thing JOG did. Only you are stating it in a
overcomplicated and basically wrong way
--> A Row does not have attributes, A relation does. You are
redefining what the meaning of an attribute.
--> Tuples are propositions validated by true in 2VL *only*. Your
logic is vague N-VL.
--> The chances such vagueness may allow to define a logical operator
such as JOIN demonstrate one thing. You have no clue of what
constitutes referential integrity and domain of values.
> So here is one join
In your dreams...pal
Received on Mon Mar 12 2007 - 19:34:50 CET