Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:38:57 GMT
Message-ID: <lWfHh.7022$PV3.63097_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
> You didn't ask me, but I can tell you what *I* like about SQL:
>
> select, project, extend, union, aggregate, and especially join! Join
> is awesome.
>
> Oh, and constraints.
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:38:57 GMT
Message-ID: <lWfHh.7022$PV3.63097_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Marshall wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2:08 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>>Walt wrote: >> >>>>What do you like about it? >> >>>It's "good enough" for a lot of purposes (to quote a post fo your from a >>>few weeks back). >> >>As is assembler. You answer is a good answer to the question: "Why do >>you use it?" I asked, "What do you like about it?" Can you do any better >>than an analog for "It doesn't sweat too bad for a fat chick."
>
> You didn't ask me, but I can tell you what *I* like about SQL:
>
> select, project, extend, union, aggregate, and especially join! Join
> is awesome.
>
> Oh, and constraints.
What about concurrency and security? The big four are manipulation, integrity, concurrency and security, are they not? Received on Tue Mar 06 2007 - 16:38:57 CET