Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Navigation question

Re: Navigation question

From: Walt <wamitty_at_verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 14:43:00 GMT
Message-ID: <UDBFh.6009$RN6.4826@trndny07>

"dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message news:1172707120.938940.196760_at_t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 28, 4:00 pm, "Walt" <wami..._at_verizon.net> wrote:
> > "dawn" <dawnwolth..._at_gmail.com> wrote in message
> >
> > <quote>
> > I am still not satisfied that I understand just what navigation is bad
> > and why "logical navigation" of the types I have presented is clumped
> > in with phyiscal navigation and considered an anti-pattern by some.
> >
> > Thanks. --dawn
> > <end quote>
> >
> > Who clumps it in with physical navigation?
>
> The Third-Generation Database System Manifesto that I referred to
> earlier is one such.

I did a quick scan of this document, and found no references to "logical navigation". There were many references to "physical navigation", and several references to "navigation" in general, but no references to "logical navigation".

Could you post an excerpt from the paper that argues against logical navigation? Received on Thu Mar 01 2007 - 08:43:00 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US