Re: Navigation question

From: dawn <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com>
Date: 28 Feb 2007 15:58:40 -0800
Message-ID: <1172707120.938940.196760@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>

On Feb 28, 4:00 pm, "Walt" <wami..._at_verizon.net> wrote:
> "dawn" <dawnwolth..._at_gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> <quote>
> I am still not satisfied that I understand just what navigation is bad
> and why "logical navigation" of the types I have presented is clumped
> in with phyiscal navigation and considered an anti-pattern by some.
>
> Thanks. --dawn
> <end quote>
>
> Who clumps it in with physical navigation?

The Third-Generation Database System Manifesto that I referred to earlier is one such.

But if you are aware of a write-up that speaks against "database navigation" and does not refer to physical navigation, I would be very pleased to read it. Thanks. --dawn Received on Wed Feb 28 2007 - 17:58:40 CST