Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:44:33 +0100
Message-ID: <45e4a5ce$0$333$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
>
> Yes, that's the one. Comes through just fine. (It's always
> a shock when my browser renders anything more challenging
> than ASCII.)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:44:33 +0100
Message-ID: <45e4a5ce$0$333$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Marshall wrote:
> mAsterdam wrote:
>> Does this (unicode 2261) >> come through: ≡ or does it look like gibberish?
>
> Yes, that's the one. Comes through just fine. (It's always
> a shock when my browser renders anything more challenging
> than ASCII.)
Brace yourself before you scroll down :-)
Playing a little with Unicode:
Mp (Marshall/paul) referential integrity =def=
forall R(a): exists S(b): a = b
becomes
or
R(a) references S(b) ≡
∀R(a): ∃S(b)| a=b
R(a) ル S(b) ≡
∀R(a): ∃!S(b)| a=b
Received on Tue Feb 27 2007 - 22:44:33 CET